We live in an era in which offensive speech is on the rise. Given its potential for harm, should this speech be banned? Nadine Strossen, professor of law at NYU School of Law and former president of the ACLU, dispels the many misunderstandings that have clouded the perpetual debates about "hate speech vs. free speech." She argues that an expansive approach to the First Amendment is most effective at promoting democracy, equality, and societal harmony and that anti-hate speech laws are not effective in reducing the feared harms, and worse yet, are likely counterproductive by giving enforcement officials the power to suppress vital expression and target minority viewpoints. The solution, maintains Strossen, instead is to promote equality and societal harmony through vibrant "counterspeech." Filmed April 5, 2018

See more Ath videos: http://tinyurl.com/MMCAth

► Like this video? SUBSCRIBE: http://tinyurl.com/CMCchannel
► Visit our website: http://www.cmc.edu/
► Follow CMC:   / claremontmckennacollege  
  / cmcnews  
  / cmcnews