On February 21, 2024, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency. The following questions are presented – (1) Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency’s federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule.

Please join our panel of experts as they broke down the case and its developments after oral argument.

Featuring:

Megan Herzog, Partner, Donahue & Goldberg LLP
Matt Kuhn, Solicitor General, Kentucky
Viktoria Seale, Regulatory Affairs Director, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
Matthew Z. Leopold, Partner, Hunton Andrews Kurth
* * * * *

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.